APOLOGIST FOR NEO-LIBERALISM AND AUTOCRACY
Lee Kuan Yew died at the age of 91 on 23 March. World leaders from
Obama in the US to Najib in Malaysia and most of the pro-market media applaud
him as a ‘great leader’ who has elevated Singapore to a modern state on a par
with the most developed countries. They admire him basically for his three
decades (1959-1990) of having absolute power that he used to assist local and
international capitalists to reap economic profits. But this was achieved by
widespread human rights abuse as well as an anti-working class and
anti-socialist agenda.
Currently, Singapore, like other developed countries, is
experiencing class polarisation with widening income inequality and rising
living costs. Singapore’s economy which is export oriented is highly dependent
on the health of the global economy. Its economic vulnerability was once again
revealed last week when the Singapore dollar performed the worst since the 1998
Asian financial crisis. GDP growth its weakening primarily because of the
slowdown in China. These are some of the symptoms caused by the vicious
neo-liberal capitalism that became the foundation for the government led by Lee
Kuan Yew and his party - the People’s Action Party (PAP).
Although considered modern and developed, Singapore is among the
countries with records of the worst human-rights violations. Lee always
identified with autocratic rule, and had some common characters with regional
leaders such as Suharto in Indonesia or Mahathir in Malaysia. Lee Kuan Yew with
one-party domination had always manipulated autocratic power to crack down
against government critics and dissidents. Lee jailed many without trial, never
allowed an independent media, and suppressed freedom of speech and freedom of
assembly. Opposition leaders who were outspoken against the government were
bankrupted by contesting in courts controlled by the government. Nepotism and
cronyism are also evident in the Singapore regime. In addition to his son, Lee
Hsieng Loong being the current Prime Minister of Singapore, his other children
and immediate family members occupy important government or business positions
in the country.
Trade unions and left
destroyed
At the beginning of his political career, Lee Kuan Yew, who
studied at the LSE (London School of Economics) used the left and the trade
unions as a platform to increase his popularity. Chin Peng, the leader of the
CPM (Communist Party of Malaya), in his autobiography ‘My Side of History’,
said about Lee’s astounding electoral victory in May, 1959: “I can certainly
say that most of the island’s workers sympathised with the left-wing trade
unions, and members of these unions well appreciated they were under the
control of the CPM. Our supporters, sympathisers and fellow travellers went on
to provide Lee’s grassroots electoral support. Without them he would never have
achieved his stunning 43-seat victory in the 51 constituencies up for decision
at the May 30 polls”.
The CPM, which had been trapped in Maoist and Stalinist
opportunist ideas, used the idea of a popular front (association with liberal
or progressive capitalist organisations or individuals) and the ‘two stages’
theory – a struggle for democratic rights first, and after accomplishing this,
then struggle for the socialist transformation - to manoeuvre in Singaporean
politics. Finally, their mistaken approach was utilised by Lee Kuan Yew to take
power and promote the agenda of capitalism in Singapore.
In 1963, confident in the consolidation of his power base, Lee
prompted the attack on the CPM by launching ‘Operation Cold Store’ which saw a
combined force of local and Malayan police conducting an island-wide round-up
of alleged communist activists. When the left-wing Singapore Association of
Trade Unions (SATU) led a general strike against the government, the
pro-communist trade union organisation was banned and many of its leaders were
arrested. ‘Operation Cold Store’ crushed the CPM underground network throughout
the island.
Those events demonstrate that the incorrect political direction
and methods of the CPM, in not taking an independent working class road, had
been capitalised on by the reactionary leaders such as Lee Kuan Yew and by the
PAP to wage a vicious attack on working class, left activists and trade
unionists.
After ‘Operation Cold Store’, the labour movement in Singapore was
massively incorporated under the state’s control to fulfil the needs of the
ruling class. The National Trades Union Congress (NTUC) was founded in 1961 to
oppose SATU. Since 1980, the main NTUC leader has always been offered a
minister-without-portfolio in a PAP cabinet to keep them under the control of
government.
At present, the NTUC is no more than a ‘puppet’ of the state and
the steadily declining union memberships since the late 1970s illustrates its
complete ineffectiveness and its bias against workers. Also, cheap migrant
workers from Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia, Sri Lanka, Philippines and other
countries, make up more than 30% of the total workforce and face a variety of
discrimination.
State capitalism
Lee Kuan Yew described himself as a socialist in the 1950s and
proclaimed that the victory of the revolution in China was a great achievement
for the country and its people. He said at that time, “I have always thought
that a Socialist is one who believes that state planning and control would
bring about the greatest benefit to the community as a whole”. But the man who
led Singapore for decades used state control and planning for opposite ends
instead of benefiting the workers and boosting their democratic rights - to
heighten the capitalists’ profits by suppressing workers’ rights. As prime
minister he opportunistically emulated the approach of the bureaucrats in China
(under Mao and then Deng) in suppressing the workers’ democracy and trade
unions to heighten state capitalism in Singapore. He established a strong
paternalistic state to accumulate capital and to achieve unnaturally rapid
economic development.
In the early 1960s, the Ministry of Finance took stakes in a
variety of local companies in sectors like manufacturing and shipbuilding. Then
in 1974 the state established Temasek Holdings to incorporate and manage these
stakes and companies. Temasek has stakes in more than 60 local and foreign
companies. In Singapore the companies range from the largest, such as SingTel,
Singapore Airlines and Singapore Power, through public icons like the Raffles
Hotel and the Singapore Zoological Gardens to the betting company, Singapore
Pools.
Although Singapore’s strategic location has given the country an
economic importance in Southeast Asia, lack of physical resources and a small
domestic market were used by the Government to adopt a pro-business,
pro-foreign investment, export-oriented economic policy combined with
state-directed investments. It makes the economy extremely vulnerable to
regional and global financial changes. This means that Singapore cannot survive
by itself, and the capitalist agenda pioneered by Lee Kuan Yew in Singapore has
lead to crises and conflicts when there are regional or global crises. It has
also meant a variety of social problems such as the tremendous difficulty in
owning a house, especially for the young generation, and a worsening wealth
polarisation between the rich and poor.
An increase in seats won by the opposition parties in the last
election marked the dwindling of public confidence in the PAP government and
the foundations of the state built by Lee Kuan Yew, considered more favourable
to the millionaires and capitalists. The undemocratic approach of the PAP and
the social conditions that oppress the masses have been used by the opposition
parties to gain support in the elections.
But, without the construction of a government that champions the
needs and welfare of the common people of Singapore, their social and economic
problems cannot be solved. A mass party based on a socialist programme must be
established to fulfil the needs and rights of the common people of Singapore as
a real alternative to the capitalist model of government established by Lee
Kuan Yew and his party, the PAP.
No comments:
Post a Comment