Opposition victory
possible for first time but workers and youth without genuine alternative
The government is soon expected to call
Malaysia’s 13th general elections - considered to be the toughest general
elections for them so far - either in March or April, following much
speculation on the election date since 2011. The BN leadership
under Najib Razak, desperate to improve its outcome, since the last general
elections has been pressured to wait until the end of its five years term. The
last general elections, called in 2008, were the worst for BN since
independence from Britain in 1957. It lost its two-thirds majority as well as
losing power in wealthy states, such as Selangor and Penang.
Early in January this year, 100,000
supporters of Pakatan Rakyat, the coalition of opposition parties, thronged to
Kuala Lumpur to advocate a change of government in the coming general
elections. The mood is very high among its supporters, which boosts further the
confidence of Pakatan Rakyat, under the leadership of Anwar Ibrahim, to capture
federal power for the first time.
‘Election Goodies’ versus Populist Agenda
‘Election Goodies’ versus Populist Agenda
Since the last two years, BN has been distributing many elections goodies in the name of welfare aids, probably the most attractive ever, to people from different races and backgrounds - rural, urban, young, old, women, student, workers and middle class - to win their support. Among them are cash hand-outs of RM500 per person with a household income lower than RM3000, and a RM 200 rebate for youths to buy ‘smartphones’. BN, with the domination of UMNO with its ‘promises fulfilled’ slogan has also been going all out to show that it has changed a lot since the last general elections by ‘reforming’ certain laws such as the notorious Internal Security Act, and introducing welfare programmes to reduce the people’s social and economic problems. But in reality, the public feels that their living standards have not changed much or are becoming worse with the prices of goods and services continuously going up, but real wages stagnating, though the government claims that inflation is still under control.
Although the democratic space has been
widened to a certain extent - especially the right to protest - other rights
like union or workers’ democratic rights and freedoms are very much controlled.
Some reforms have also been made to the electoral systems that favoured the
ruling government, after the pressure from the ‘Bersih’ movement. However, the
opposition still has suspicions that fraud could still occur, since the
Malaysian Election Commission is seen as ‘closer’ to government.
Pakatan Rakyat leaders with their
populist agenda promise that they will be a better government with promises
such as free education, cheaper cars and reduced petrol prices. They are also
giving examples of their success in ruling some of the states since the last
general elections, such as the reduction of corruption and improving
transparency, and introduction of some welfare aid programmes.
Some people feel that certain government services have been improved in the states under Pakatan control in Selangor, Penang and Kedah since the last general elections. Nevertheless, the five years of Pakatan state governments have not solved fundamental social and economic problems such as wages, escalating housing prices, rights for workers, environmental issues etc, but rather concentrate on giving welfare aid to compete with the goodies given by the BN government. The programme and policies of Pakatan as well as their master plan in their ‘Orange Book’ shows that they are comfortable working within the framework of capitalism, rather than to challenge the profit oriented system to fulfill the fundamental needs of people.
‘Minimum Wage’ to gain working class votes
The BN government has also introduced a
minimum wage for the first time to garner support from the working class. But
the wage of RM800 in Borneo states and RM900 in Peninsular states that the
government introduced in January are far below a real living wage at the
present time. Even with that inadequate amount for workers, there have already
been many manipulations in the minimum wage implementations by employers that
want to retain their low wages policy. The government also succumbs to the
pressure of employers to reduce the benefits for migrant workers. Wage
exploitation by unscrupulous employers will continue, especially for
unorganised, casual, outsourcing/contract and part-time workers for as long as
the government’s law and policy implementations cater for the needs of free
market capitalism.
Pakatan Rakyat promised that it could
implement RM1100 as the minimum wage. Some unions, like the National Union of
Bank Employees, have demanded that the minimum wage be set at RM1500 taking the
inflations rate at present time into account, which the Pakatan rejected,
saying that the ‘free market’ wouldn’t accept it. This revealed the true colour
of Pakatan who use populist slogans, such as a ‘people oriented economy’ but
are unwilling to confront the profit oriented system of capitalism to increase
the living standards of workers and ordinary people.
‘Hung Parliament’ after elections ?
The vast majority of people are not
convinced with both parties’ policies and programmes, and are still undecided
on who they would vote for. Most of the urban middle class and young people
support Pakatan, in the hope that they would improve democratic and social
rights. In rural areas the BN still has upper hand with their ‘money, media and
machinery’, though Pakatan has also improved its support here in recent times.
Although most analysts predicted that
BN could win but with slim majority, some have not ruled out a possible first
opposition victory. Some also predict that a ‘hung parliament’ could develop,
without either BN or Pakatan with a clear majority. This could create prolonged
instability in government.
The BN government has been using economic
growth, at around 5%, to garner support and be elected again, but the growth
has not been translated into real improvements in living standards for ordinary
people, where the gap between the rich and poor is one of the worst in
Southeast Asia. Since the world economic slowdown that started in 2008, BN
government has pumped billions of ringgits to stimulate the domestic
economy but with the prolonged uncertainties in the global economy, exports and
FDI (Foreign Direct Investment) have not much improved. The return of a BN
government for another term, alongside a continuing or worsening world economic
crisis, would be a government of austerity cuts to counter the budget deficit
and increasing debt. This could lead to social explosions that could
destabilise the government, and create further political conflicts.
Although an opposition win for the
first time would give hope of a better government, this could diminish fast
when the Pakatan government fails to significantly improve the social and economic
interests of the people.
The ‘Arab Spring’ has been used by
former Prime Minister, Mahathir, and others in BN to create fear among voters
that the oppositions winning elections would create more instability. But,
whoever come to power, if the social and economic needs of the people are not
progressing or are worsening, an ‘Arab Spring’ type response from the people is
inevitable.
Socialists and Trade Unions
PSM (Socialist Party) which was not
formally part of Pakatan but has been friendly towards them has now publicly
announced that there are willing to join Pakatan Rakyat coalitions. This
decision has been made in order to regain the seats they won in the last
elections under Pakatan banner and to avoid a clash with Pakatan Rakyat in the
coming elections. Although social, economic and environmental issues that
affected the people are highlighted in their programme as well as support for
workers demands such as a minimum wage of RM1500, no alternative solutions are
given to address issues other than the defeat of UMNO/BN. Their position is
like an “Anything But UMNO/BN (ABU)” position! This shows that the PSM has
further moved away from the socialists task to adopt a working class
independent position and to build a party for working class and the oppressed
as the alternative to the pro-capitalist parties.
In the last few years, attacks on
workers’ rights and welfare have risen with the BN’s pro-capitalist policies.
The pressure from workers has pushed some of the trade union leaders to call
for protests. The protests from bank, railway, car and other workers in recent
times raise confidence that the workers should unite to struggle for their
rights. But the leadership of MTUC has not been building united struggles to
defeat the pro-capitalist policies of governments but rather succumbing to
either government or capitalist demands.
The workers that feel anger towards BN
pro-capitalist policies will choose to vote for Pakatan as in the last general
elections with no other alternatives on offer but the character of Pakatan,
which supports the free market and capitalism also shows it will not solve the
workers’ demands if it takes power. The position of Pakatan, to disagree even
with the decent demands of a minimum wage of RM1500 shows that they will not confront
the capitalists to further the interests of workers and ordinary people.
This shows that workers and ordinary
people looking for a genuine change have no real alternative between Pakatan
and BN. This underlines that, for a genuine change, the workers, trade unions
and socialists have crucial task to initiate the building of a mass working
class party with a programme and policies to enhance democratic rights and the
social and economic needs of working class, young people and others oppressed
under the capitalist system. Only in this way, a government for 99% that
prioritises their needs and rights can be built as the alternative to
government for the 1% that prioritises the profits of capitalists and their
cronies. This will be the way forward towards building a democratic socialist
society in Malaysia and Internationally.
Some of CWI Malaysia’s demands for the elections:
• Clean and impartial elections,
including fair access to media and government facilities
• Democratic rights, including the
right to assemble and to protest
• Students rights and freedoms to
express views and get involved in politics
• Equal rights for women in workplaces
and in society
• For sustainable environment and safe
power, no to nuclear power
• Workers’ and Trade union rights, and
for a fighting trade union leadership
• Need for a mass working class party
as the alternative to pro-capitalist parties. This party should also support
the struggles of young people and others oppressed under capitalism.
• International solidarity with the
workers and oppressed
• For a socialist planned economy as
the alternative to the free market economy to plan for the social and economic
needs of people
• Socialism as the alternative to
capitalism to build a just society to fulfill the needs and rights of everybody
regardless of race and religion and for a sustainable environment.
Ravi, CWI Malaysia
No comments:
Post a Comment